Gorilla Marketing

I am an avid fan of podcasts. I listen to many hours a week of interesting and compelling content completely on my own schedule. The TWiT Network produces some of the best, including This Week in Tech, MacBreak Weekly and Roz Rows the Pacific. Leo Laporte is a master behind the microphone.

Leo continues to chase profitability by adding an ever-increasing array of sponsors for his “netcasting” ventures. Drobo and GoToMeeting are recent additions and he is pushing the boundaries of tolerance with the seemingly endless droning on about Visa’s security protection for online fraud.

The award for the long-time favorite sponsor, however, would have to go to Audible — the stalwart anchor that continues to support Leo’s multi-faceted network. And Leo is not alone, as many podcasters are enjoying the revenue producing sponsorship of Audible.com. Could there be a more perfect match for Audible’s target market? Certainly the person who is willing to jam ear buds into his head and listen to two hours of TWiT a week is the ideal market for Audible’s audio books.

But I can’t help but wonder if the budding podcasters, in their enthusiasm to generate revenue for their efforts, have not inadvertently allowed a Trojan horse into their camp. Hear me out. There are a finite number of hours that I have available in a week to listen to audio content. I currently spend all of those available hours listening to my favorite podcasts. Audible’s products are in direct competition for my attention with the very podcasts that carry them as advertisers. If I respond to the Audible ad and buy a book, or worse, a monthly subscription to books, the time to listen to those books is drawn directly from the time I normally spend listening to podcasts.

Audible 1, Podcasters 0.

It would be like McDonald’s in-store advertising carrying spots for Burger King. Or a radio station carrying ads for satellite radio. I am not a marketing guru but me thinks it might be wise to be a bit more selective in the choice of sponsors.

Similar Posts

  • What is the purpose of an economy anyway?

    I heard a reporter on a recent Economist podcast say that, in light of the growing UK economy, creating jobs is a good thing.

    It seems to me that creating jobs is not only a good thing, creating jobs is the thing. What other purpose is there for an economy?

    Here’s what I mean. An ‘economy’ is kind of a meta-thing that emerges whenever two or more people get together and decide that working together to meet everybody’s needs is more efficient than everyone trying to each meet 100% of their own needs (like, say, some kind of off-the-grid survivalist). Economies emerge in all kinds of places: prison economies, school-yard economies, national economies, global economies.

  • “The Market” vs “The Economy”

    With all the volatility in the stock market lately it is a good time to remind ourselves that “the market” is not the same as “the economy.” The best that I can tell — at least as of the last few years — “the market” has contracted to a relatively small group of:

    • professional traders
    • automated computer programs
    • institutional investors
    • hedge fund managers

    This tight-knit circle trades amongst itself with very little relevance to what we think of as “the economy.” In contrast to this closed group, the economy is the vast sum of the creation and delivery of the goods and services we want and need.

    It seems to me that the Dow Jones Industrial Average and S&P 500 bears little connection to these things these days.

    Don’t be afraid. Now is the time to be bold. If you don’t like the economy, let’s go out and make one of our own.

  • Redefining WMD

    MSNBC ran the startling headline this morning: Man arrested near Capitol faces WMD charge. How intriguing! Was a criminal mastermind skulking through the streets of DC with a nuclear bomb in his trunk?

    [The suspect] tried to manufacture a “weapon of mass destruction, that is, an explosive device capable of causing multiple deaths or serious bodily injuries to multiple persons, or massive destruction of property,”

    At the height of the Cold War, “weapons of mass destruction” meant nuclear warheads that were capable of eliminating broad swaths of humanity with a single explosion. With the onset of the “war on terror” we expanded WMD to include bio-weapons that could infect the water supply for an entire city or chemicals that could poison the air of a local community. …

  • M*A*S*H

    Know this. You can cut me off from the civilized world. You can incarcerate me with two moronic cellmates. You can torture me with your thrice-daily swill. But you cannot break the spirit of a Winchester. My voice shall be heard from this wilderness, and I shall be delivered from this fetid and festering sewer.

    Charles Emerson Winchester, III

    I became a giant fan of M*A*S*H during my undergraduate years in college. By the time I tuned in the show had been on the air for many seasons and had found its stride. Each night the dorm lounge would fill up with fans as we all partook of the syndicated re-runs punctuated once a week with a fresh fix. The writing was superb, the acting a joy to watch. The storylines were moving and yet funny. It seems like every character was my favorite. I have seen each episode so many times I can recite the entire plot line within seconds of seeing the opening sequence.

    The quote above from Charles Emerson Winchester is one of my favorites. …

  • Consumers Go On Strike

    As the economy continues to sour, consumers have gone on strike. For the past few months, I have been contemplating the following economic and social trends that seem to explain why.

    • American productivity has risen almost 20% in the last decade (Source)
    • Real median income over the same period has declined (Source)
    • Executive compensation has risen astronomically (Source)
    • Consumer debt has risen substantially (Source)
    • Consumer spending comprises 70% of GDP

    Rising productivity is what enables companies to increase employee’s pay. Increases in pay result in the overall rise in our standard of living. However, in the last decade, this relationship between productivity and rising employee pay seems to have been fractured.

One Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.