Change

If you want to defeat any kind of vicious fraud–comply with it literally, adding nothing of your own to disguise its nature.

—Ayn Rand, Spoken by Francisco d’Aconia to Hank Rearden in Atlas Shrugged

I have been a leader in a number of organizations that were in dire need of change. Building a “case for change” is usually difficult. People seem compelled to continue in their dysfunctional ways despite their inefficacy or discomfort. I have learned that sometimes you have to let things fall to the floor and break before you can pick up the shards and create the change that the organization so desperately needs.

Atlas Shrugged struck me as a testament to this approach to change management, albeit with a more poetic and metaphorical approach. In Rand’s world the capitalistic model is failing due to the parasites of laziness and entitlements. Her approach is to let it collapse on itself and pick up the pieces after the crash. Francisco d’Aconia runs a global network of copper mines. He maintains the illusion that all is well and that his mines are productive . . . until one day they are not. He then utters the profound statement quoted above.

How many times do we protect dysfunctional or broken systems by covering up their true nature? It is human nature to try and see things better than they are. But in so doing we prolong the healing. We tell ourselves that troubled relationships are different than they are. We fail to see things through in our minds to their logical conclusion.

In some ways, I can’t help but wonder if this is not what has happened to our banking industry. A profit model that is based solely on revenue generated by transactions, with no accommodation for the quality or future of that transaction, has been pushed to its logical conclusion. Our regulatory system has complied with the fraud literally and we are watching the collapse of banking as we knew it. I hope that they system that comes along to replace it offers more focus on longer-term investments and less on bonuses and short-term profits.

Similar Posts

  • Occupy Wall Street’s Beef: Wall Street is Cheating

    These people aren’t protesting money. They’re not protesting banking. They’re protesting corruption on Wall Street.

    Matt Taibbi finally articulated what I have been trying to find words for. I don’t begrudge Wall Street, or anyone, their good fortune (I seek the same good fortune). I just begrudge the way a few people have rigged the system in their favor.

  • Dear United: It Didn’t Have To Be This Way

    Last summer I had a Delta flight out of La Guardia bound for Detroit. It was a Saturday morning and the airport was swarming with passengers, the gate area for my flight was like a mosh pit. As we approached the time to board, a gate agent announced that the flight was oversold by seven passengers. An audible groan rippled through the waiting area as we all clutched our boarding passes and jockeyed further for position in the boarding process. This was not going to be easy.

    The Delta / traveler negotiation process began when the agent offered the usual $400 travel voucher for anyone willing to take a later flight. In a delightful New York accent, a lady standing beside me smirked, “They’ll pay more.” Sure enough, moments later they announced that a $500 voucher was now available to any travelers with flexible travel plans. I smiled as I acknowledged the prophetic power of my fellow traveler. As my plans did not feel flexible, I gratefully made my way onto the plane.

    After the plane was fully loaded, with the last few passengers jamming bags into the overhead bins, a voice rang out over the airplane announcement system that Delta still needed one more passenger to give up their seat. This time, however, they had upped the ante.

  • One must not think ill of the paradox

    One must not think ill of the paradox, for the paradox is the passion of thought, and the thinker without paradox is like the lover without passion: a mediocre fellow.

    — Søren Kierkegaard, from Philosophical Fragments

    At one point in my life I was formally studying philosophy. Not coincidentally, I was also struggling deeply with various aspects of Christianity and religion. Kierkegaard became a hero. He was a troubled soul who was as prolific at journaling as I was, and who shared many of the same intellectual struggles I was contemplating.

    I have always relished the paradox. …

  • What is the purpose of an economy anyway?

    I heard a reporter on a recent Economist podcast say that, in light of the growing UK economy, creating jobs is a good thing.

    It seems to me that creating jobs is not only a good thing, creating jobs is the thing. What other purpose is there for an economy?

    Here’s what I mean. An ‘economy’ is kind of a meta-thing that emerges whenever two or more people get together and decide that working together to meet everybody’s needs is more efficient than everyone trying to each meet 100% of their own needs (like, say, some kind of off-the-grid survivalist). Economies emerge in all kinds of places: prison economies, school-yard economies, national economies, global economies.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.