<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>It Seems To Me &#187; Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itseemstome.com/ISTM/tag/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itseemstome.com/ISTM</link>
	<description>Musings on technology, business, politics, and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:05:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Newspapers vs. Journalism</title>
		<link>http://itseemstome.com/ISTM/2009/05/02/newspapers-vs-journalism/</link>
		<comments>http://itseemstome.com/ISTM/2009/05/02/newspapers-vs-journalism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 12:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hhollick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Quotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itseemstome.com/ISTM/2009/04/29/newspapers-vs-journalism/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Society doesn’t need newspapers. What we need is journalism. For a century, the imperatives to strengthen journalism and to strengthen newspapers have been so tightly wound as to be indistinguishable. That’s been a fine accident to have, but when that accident stops, as it is stopping before our eyes, we’re going to need lots of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote style="clear: both"><p>Society doesn’t need newspapers. What we need is journalism. For a century, the imperatives to strengthen journalism and to strengthen newspapers have been so tightly wound as to be indistinguishable. That’s been a fine accident to have, but when that accident stops, as it is stopping before our eyes, we’re going to need lots of other ways to strengthen journalism instead.</p>
<p>— Clay Shirky</p>
</blockquote>
<p><br class="final-break" style="clear: both" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itseemstome.com/ISTM/2009/05/02/newspapers-vs-journalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redefining WMD</title>
		<link>http://itseemstome.com/ISTM/2008/03/26/new-lows-for-doublespeak/</link>
		<comments>http://itseemstome.com/ISTM/2008/03/26/new-lows-for-doublespeak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hhollick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itseemstome.com/ISTM/2008/03/26/new-lows-for-doublespeak/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSNBC ran the startling headline this morning: Man arrested near Capitol faces WMD charge. How intriguing! Was a criminal mastermind skulking through the streets of DC with a nuclear bomb in his trunk? &#60;the suspect&#62; tried to manufacture a &#8220;weapon of mass destruction, that is, an explosive device capable of causing multiple deaths or serious [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSNBC ran the startling headline this morning: <a title="MSNBC Article" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23803125/" target="blank">Man arrested near Capitol faces WMD charge</a>. How intriguing! Was a criminal mastermind skulking through the streets of DC with a nuclear bomb in his trunk?</p>
<blockquote><p>&lt;the suspect&gt; tried to manufacture a &#8220;weapon of mass destruction, that is, an explosive device capable of causing multiple deaths or serious bodily injuries to multiple persons, or massive destruction of property,&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>At the height of the Cold War, &#8220;weapons of mass destruction&#8221; meant nuclear warheads that were capable of eliminating broad swaths of humanity with a single explosion. With the onset of the &#8220;war on terror&#8221; we expanded WMD to include bio-weapons that could infect the water supply for an entire city or chemicals that could poison the air of a local community.</p>
<p>Now it seems that our redefinition of the phrase has gone too far. From the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>The device was made of a can of gunpowder taped to a box of shotgun shells and a bottle with buckshot or BB pellets, according to court documents.</p></blockquote>
<p>Excuse me? Our BB Bomber constructed a make-shift bomb from a coffee can and some shotgun shells  and he is being charged with trying to manufacture a WMD? What can the phrase mean if a quick trip to Wal-Mart and some duct tape yields a weapon of mass destruction? I fear that our language is deteriorating faster than our laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itseemstome.com/ISTM/2008/03/26/new-lows-for-doublespeak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s wrong with online advertising</title>
		<link>http://itseemstome.com/ISTM/2008/03/15/whats-wrong-with-online-video-advertising/</link>
		<comments>http://itseemstome.com/ISTM/2008/03/15/whats-wrong-with-online-video-advertising/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 19:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hhollick</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huh?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itseemstome.com/ISTM/2008/03/15/whats-wrong-with-online-video-advertising/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the news broke today that a crane had fallen in New York City I immediately went to the web in search of video footage. CNN was my first stop. As expected, they had a video clip at the top of the page. The next two minutes were a stunning realization of all that is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the news broke today that a crane had fallen in New York City I immediately went to the web in search of video footage. <a href="http://www.cnn.com/" title="CNN.com">CNN</a> was my first stop. As expected, they had a video clip at the top of the page.</p>
<p>The next two minutes were a stunning realization of all that is wrong with the current attempts to monetize online video. The clip was 75 seconds long. In order to watch the clip I had to endure a 30 second pre-roll advertisement . . . for VIAGRA!</p>
<p>I am a woman in my late 40&#8242;s who has no need or interest in Viagra. The length of the ad was nearly 1/2 as long as the length of the news clip and I had absolutely no interest in the product. What a waste of my time.</p>
<p>I used to pay CNN an annual subscription to access their online content without advertising. What a pity that they discontinued this service. I would rather pay a few dollars a year for their service then waste precious time and have my brain cluttered with useless advertisements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://itseemstome.com/ISTM/2008/03/15/whats-wrong-with-online-video-advertising/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

